On my regular hops across the net and specially Wikipedia, I come across some fine gems. They usually crack me up or set me thinking. In some cases, they astonish me. As was the case this morning.
Having done my share of pyschology classes and reading on Jung and such, this shouldn’t have come as a surprise. The emotion – Love – broken down into its various forms. Thought it made sense enough to post.
The Triangular Theory of Love.
The rubric is based on 3 factors:
The explanation of each: [source:wikipedia]
1. Nonlove is the absence of all three of Sternberg’s components of love.
2. Liking in this case is not used in a trivial sense. Sternberg says that this intimate liking characterizes true friendships, in which a person feels a bondedness, a warmth, and a closeness with another but not intense passion or long-term commitment.
3. Infatuated love is often what is felt as “love at first sight”. But without the intimacy and the commitment components of love, infatuated love may disappear suddenly.
4. Empty love: Sometimes, a stronger love deteriorates into empty love, in which the commitment remains, but the intimacy and passion have died. In cultures in which arranged marriages are common, relationships often begin as empty love and develop into one of the other forms with the passing of time.
5. Romantic love: Romantic lovers are bonded emotionally (as in liking) and physically through passionate arousal.
6. Companionate love is often found in marriages in which the passion has gone out of the relationship, but a deep affection and commitment remain. Companionate love is generally a personal relation you build with somebody you share your life with, but with no sexual or physical desire. It is stronger than friendship because of the extra element of commitment. The love ideally shared between family members is a form of companionate love, as is the love between deep friends or those who spend a lot of time together in any asexual but friendly relationship.
7. Fatuous love can be exemplified by a whirlwind courtship and marriage in which a commitment is motivated largely by passion, without the stabilizing influence of intimacy.
8. Consummate love is the complete form of love, representing the ideal relationship toward which many people strive. Sternberg cautions that maintaining a consummate love may be even harder than achieving it. He stresses the importance of translating the components of love into action. “Without expression,” he warns, “even the greatest of loves can die” (1987, p.341). Consummate love may not be permanent. For example, if passion is lost over time, it may change into companionate love.
Nice eh? Know where all you’ve been? Ive probably traipsed all over the Bermuda triangle, and sunk happily somewhere along the way.